<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Open / Social / Knowledge	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.prototyping.es/uncategorized/open-social-knowledge/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.prototyping.es/uncategorized/open-social-knowledge</link>
	<description>how social experimentation works</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 18:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alberto		</title>
		<link>https://www.prototyping.es/uncategorized/open-social-knowledge/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alberto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prototyping.es/?p=126#comment-97</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sure. The practices that mobilize the social are certainly different, and it is a matter of ethnographic/sociological research to elucidate what exactly it is that we are talking about in each case.  But that we are in all cases invoking a notion of sociality / commensality to convey an image of economic generativity is surely interesting in itself.  If the &#039;great transformation&#039;, as Polanyi called it, disembedded &#039;economy&#039; from &#039;society&#039;, today we are witnessing an (allegedly) major re-embedding: the social is everywhere invoked as an indispensable economic engine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure. The practices that mobilize the social are certainly different, and it is a matter of ethnographic/sociological research to elucidate what exactly it is that we are talking about in each case.  But that we are in all cases invoking a notion of sociality / commensality to convey an image of economic generativity is surely interesting in itself.  If the &#8216;great transformation&#8217;, as Polanyi called it, disembedded &#8216;economy&#8217; from &#8216;society&#8217;, today we are witnessing an (allegedly) major re-embedding: the social is everywhere invoked as an indispensable economic engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adolfo		</title>
		<link>https://www.prototyping.es/uncategorized/open-social-knowledge/comment-page-1#comment-91</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adolfo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 11:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prototyping.es/?p=126#comment-91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Perhaps, we have to forget about the social? or try to understand which kind of &#039;social&#039; is mobilized in each of these cases, because I guess that the social is very different in all of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps, we have to forget about the social? or try to understand which kind of &#8216;social&#8217; is mobilized in each of these cases, because I guess that the social is very different in all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
