While there has always been innovation, it would be cruel not admit abuse and squeezes ahead of demand, which have come to exhausting its true value, putting the intrinsic economic interest before their sole response capacity historically dependent on needs.
It’s been too easy to tag all innovative proposals when they have been partial and occasional patches of an outdated model, and long-term harmful.
That is why it detects a victimhood with real arguments in their process that throw us into a hole that doesn’t attend to needs. Faced with this crisis in innovation the response will be so bold radical according to the alarming situation in which we find ourselves.
It would be interesting to answer a series of questions such as: Is innovation dependent on creation or is destruction the key to it? How do you build the path of creation based on destruction? How not to fall in victimhood of innovation?
Members of the group:
A.Becerra, C.Irala, M.Mancho, M.Parra. UFV Students
Continue reading »